Thursday, April 24, 2008

BMW Is Taking A Hit From The US

BMW generates almost 20 percent from it´s revenue in the US. On top of this lots of the profit from almost every carmaker comes from their finance unit..... I assume the headwinds from this part of the business is facing some serious headwinds for some time to come.... At the year end report BMW pointed to only a slight increase in delinquencies to 0.46...... Times are changing very quickly......

BMW macht knapp über 20 % vom Umsatz in den USA. Hinzu kommt das bei fast jedem Autohersteller die Gewinne aus dem Finanzarm einen ganz erheblichen Anteil an den Gewinnen haben ( oder sollte ich besser sagen hatten.... ). Zumindest wird es zukünftig deutlich schwieriger hier an die goldenen Zeiten der Vergangenheit anzuknüpfen..... Zitat BMW Ende 2007 :"Dort verschlechterte sich die Risikosituation durch die Kreditkrise im Vorjahresvergleich. Die Quote der Forderungsausfälle im Segment Finanzdienstleistungen stieg gegenüber dem Vorjahr um fünf Basispunkte auf 0,46 %."

The Board of Management of BMW AG decided at the board meeting held today to increase the amount of risk provision recognised in the first quarter of the financial year 2008 in the light of the repercussions of the international financial crisis. The financial crisis has become more severe of late. This has resulted in a drop in pre-owned car selling prices, particularly in North America, and consequently in a reduction of revenues that can be generated on vehicles at the end of lease contracts. This downward trend accelerated during the month of March. For the above reasons, it was necessary to recognise a higher risk provision for lease vehicles on the one hand and for the increased level of bad debts/payment arrears on the other. In total, an expense of euro 236 million was recognised.

BMW Der Vorstand der BMW AG hat in seiner heutigen Sitzung entschieden, angesichts der Auswirkungen der internationalen Finanzkrise die Risikovorsorge im ersten Quartal des Geschäftsjahres 2008 zu erhöhen. Die Finanzkrise hat sich zuletzt verschärft. Infolge dessen sanken insbesondere in Nordamerika die Gebrauchtwagenpreise und damit die Erlöse für Fahrzeuge, die aus Leasingverträgen zurückkommen. Dieser Abwärtstrend hat sich im März verstärkt. Die oben genannten Gründe machten zudem eine höhere Risikovorsorge für den Bestand an Leasingfahrzeugen sowie für erhöhte Kreditausfälle und Zahlungsverzögerungen notwendig. Insgesamt belaufen sich die Ergebnisbelastungen auf 236 Mio. Euro.
> Here is an interesting chart that shows how sometimes irrational markets often appear... GM has only underperformed BMW slightly during the past 3 years ( at least on a nominal basis and when you compare the fundamentals ) .... BMW has had almost 18 billions € in operating cash flow during this timeframe and has an excellent A rating from the agencies....... We all know that GM has probably lost a similar $ amount during the same period and is rated as junk.....
> Hier mal ein nettes Beispiel wie "merkwürdig" sich Aktien teilweise verhalten.... GM had über ienen Zeitraum von 3 Jahren nur unwesentlich schlechter als BMW abgeschnitten ( wenn man die Währung mal aussen vor läßt )... BMW hat in dieser Zeit einen operativen Cash Flow von über 18 Mrd € erzielt und wird mit einem esrtklassigen A Kreditrating ( für einen Automobilhersteller ) von den Ratingagenturen bewertet.... GM hat bekanntermaßen einen noch größeren vergleichbaren Mittelabfluß "erwirtschaftet"und wird folgerichtig selbst von den größtenteils inkompetenten Ratingagenturen mit Junk bewertet.......
Update:
Moody's Investors Service on Friday lowered the rating outlook for General Motors Corp. to negative from stable because of weakness at GMAC LLC's subsidiary, ResCap LLC. Moody's affirmed GM's B3 corporate family rating and its SGL-1 speculative grade liquidity rating. "The change in outlook reflects Moody's concerns that GMAC LLC's ability to provide retail and wholesale funding in support of GM's automotive operations may be eroded by the operating weakness at its subsidiary, ResCap LLC," Moody's said in a statement. About $35 billion of GM debt is affected by the ratings
AddThis Feed Button

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Bond Risk Rises on Concern Over Bear Stearns Hedge-Fund Losses

But i was told that the subprime problems were "contained" day in and day out...... with spreads everywhere close to lows this could help and reduce the unbelievable riks appetite that is out there...and this time maybe for longer than 2 weeks.....

Und mir hat man täglich erzählt das die probleme im Subprime segment isoliert sind.....nachdem immer noch alle Risikoaufschläge nahe historischen Tiefstständen notieren könnten die probleme im Hypothekenmarkt zumindest dazu beitragen etwas von dem unfassbaren Risikohunger aus den Märkten zunehmen (dieses Mal evtl. sogar dauerhaft)

The perceived risk of owning corporate bonds soared worldwide on concern over losses at hedge funds run by Bear Stearns Cos.

Credit-default swaps based on 10 million euros ($13 million) of debt included in the iTraxx Crossover Series 7 Index of 50 European companies jumped as much as 16,000 euros to 216,000 euros, the biggest one-day rise in three months, according to Deutsche Bank AG. The CDX Crossover index in New York surged as much as $10,000 to a nine-month high of $178,000. ....


Loans Index
The LCDX index of credit-default swaps on high-yield, high- risk loans fell for a ninth day, dropping 1.19 to 98.08, signaling a deterioration in the perception of the creditworthiness of the 100 U.S. borrowers included in the index. The LCDX is down 2.55 since May 22, when 13 Wall Street banks began offering the five-year contracts in the privately negotiated over-the-counter market.

As home-loan defaults rise, bondholders stand to lose as much as $75 billion of subprime-mortgage securities, according to an April estimate from Pacific Investment Management Co., manager of the world's largest bond fund. Investors in all mortgage bonds will probably take about $100 billion in losses, according to a March report from Citigroup Inc. bond analysts.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, May 31, 2007

U.S. Economy Expanded at a 0.6% Annual Rate in First Quarter / weakest in more than 4 years

thank god that the housing spillover is "contained".... more from paper money


nur gut das die probleme im immomarkt nicht auf die wirtschaft ausstrahlen.....

U.S. economy grew last quarter at a 0.6 percent annual rate, the weakest in more than four years, as housing slumped, the trade deficit widened and businesses reduced inventories.

The gain in gross domestic product is the weakest since the last three months of 2002 and compares with a 1.3 percent pace initially estimated last month, according to revised figures from the Commerce Department today in Washington.

Last quarter may prove to be the low point for the economy as recent reports showed business spending improved and leaner stockpiles prompted factories to boost production, economists said. Such an outcome would bear out forecasts by Federal Reserve policy makers, who this month reiterated that growth will pickup for the rest of this year and into next

>the same "experts" that saw a strong q1 at the end of 2006....

>von den gleichen hellen köpfen ide ende 2006 ein starkes q1 2007 erwartet haben....

Labels: , ,

Thursday, December 21, 2006

"Global Rebalance, Consumer Imbalance / us spillover risks / pimco"

a very detailed outlook from pimco. but i have to admit that they seem to be very optimistic in their assumption regarding the impact of the housing slump in the us. so i think their call for a soft landing is very optimistic. but they made it clear that the risk is to the downside.

sehr ausführliche vorschau auf 2007 von pimco. muß gestehen das ich denke das sie sehr optimistisch im zusammenhang mit dem rückgang im us immomarkt umgehen. denke dager das deren soft landing wohl eher optimistisch ist. immerhin sagt pimco das die risikien klar gen süden gehen.




The PIMCO outlook sees growth coming in at close to 2% in the U.S., Eurozone and Japan over the next 12 months. The U.S. growth forecast is below the consensus 2½% expectation, ...... The 2-2½% range for U.S. inflation, measured by the core PCE index, suggests a modest pace of disinflation next year, .........

Overall, this adds up to a soft landing for the U.S. economy and for the global economy following a period of robust global growth. The Federal Reserve and a number of other central banks remain focused on late cycle inflation risks, but we expect those concerns to subside. We expect a combination of continued sub-par growth and an improving inflation outlook to lead to Fed rate cuts, starting after the first quarter. ( not because inflation is low but the economy is heading south.../ aber nicht wegen der infaltion sondern wegen der schwachen us wirtschaft......)

Overall, we see the risks to our U.S. soft landing call as slanted to the downside. The U.S. housing market, which helped to support U.S. consumer spending and in turn the global economy earlier in the decade is now a significant source of global risk. Eurozone and Japanese economic performance has improved markedly. But growth that is driven by investment spending rather than consumer spending remains vulnerable if U.S. consumer spending slows significantly. The U.S. remains the world’s bass drum.


Partial Rebalancing
Slower U.S. growth means that the world economy has become a bit more balanced. ...... In the past two quarters the Eurozone economy has grown at a 3.1% annualized rate, faster than the 2.4% growth rate in the U.S.

Within the U.S., growth has become more balanced, shown in Figure 2, owing to the moderation in consumer spending and the housing correction. U.S. consumer spending has cooled, growing by 2.7% year over year in the third quarter, compared with an average of about 3.5% since the start of 2004 and 3.7% over the past decade. Over the past two years U.S. GDP and U.S. domestic demand have expanded at the same rate. In contrast, over the past 10 years, domestic demand growth outstripped GDP growth by about half a percentage point per year. The current account deficit, which increased from 1% of GDP in 1996 to more than 7% in the fourth quarter of 2005 has since stabilized below that level.


The U.S. housing sector is in recession, with residential investment subtracting about 1 percentage point from the annualized GDP growth rate over the past two quarters. PIMCO’s housing experts expect that the housing market correction will be a long and drawn out process. Over the cyclical horizon, we expect residential investment to continue to subtract from GDP at a somewhat lesser rate. The labor market remains strong but over time we expect the weakness in the housing and related sectors to feed into job losses. The impact of the housing market on related sectors can already be seen with the ISM manufacturing index dipping below 50, reflecting the impact of the housing market inventory correction and also the Detroit car manufacturers’ woes.

Consumer Imbalance
The clearest sign of decoupling in the U.S. lies in the fact that the ISM non-manufacturing survey indicates the service sector remains strong, to date.(only a matter of time .../ nur ne frage der zeit....) The clearest sign of global decoupling lies in the fact that business surveys in the Eurozone and Japan remain at elevated levels, even though the expectations components have weakened.

Strong business confidence is reflected in strong investment spending. Gross fixed capital formation in plant and equipment has grown at close to a 6% rate in Japan since the start of 2004. Eurozone overall gross fixed capital formation grew at close to a 3% rate over the same period.

But as Figures 3 and 4 show, consumer spending has lagged, growing at about a 1.5% rate in the Eurozone and a bit slower than that in Japan. In part this reflects weak wage growth, which has been held down by both cyclical and secular factors, even though employment growth has strengthened this year.

On PIMCO’s baseline forecasts, a U.S. soft landing and growth at trend in the Eurozone and Japan next year will hopefully facilitate a handover to consumer spending outside the U.S., which is crucial to a rebalancing of the global economy over time. It would be easier to be confident that global rebalancing would continue during continued sub-par U.S. growth – or if there was a hard landing in the U.S. – if consumer spending rather than investment was already driving growth in the Eurozone and Japan. Business confidence and investment plans are likely to be highly sensitive to weaker than expected global growth...... (lots of if´s......./ ne menge wenn´s......)
U.S. Spillover Risk
The key uncertainty in judging the U.S. outlook is whether the housing market inventory correction will prove to be relatively well contained, or whether there will be domestic spillover effects to consumer spending........ The lagged impact of below-trend growth, including expected continued contraction in housing and housing-related sectors, is expected to translate into job losses. here is more on the jobs picture and the ripple effect http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/09/anteil-immobiliensektor-am.html,http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/search?q=ripple, http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/search?q=tools

Trying to assess the impact of flat or lower home prices on consumer spending is more of a walk in the dark. A large part of the problem is that there is no U.S. precedent for the current conjunction of a housing correction, a personal savings rate of zero and the uncertainty created by the boom in mortgage equity withdrawal (MEW) in recent years and its uncertain relationship with consumer spending. Therefore, it is necessary to be modest in making a forecast.(better be realistic.../ lieber realistisch...)

PIMCO’s forecast of a U.S. soft landing includes the expectation of a moderate slowdown in consumer spending next year, with the negative ongoing impact from the housing market partially offset by wage growth and the boost to real incomes from lower energy prices. But there is a great degree of uncertainty in the outlook.......

The wealth effect from rising asset prices, and the greater ease of liquefying house price gains, has meant that, in aggregate, U.S. households have stopped saving out of income. Savings rates are hard to forecast, but the current stagnation of house prices and a reassessment of the rate of future house price appreciation will put upward pressure on the savings rate over time. ( fro here on there is only one way t go..., kann eh nur noch nach oben gehen....)

U.S. consumer spending has proved largely impervious to the forces of gravity in recent years. If MEW turns out to have been an important driver of consumer spending, then the leveling off of house prices and associated drop in equity withdrawal may have a more direct, mechanical and pronounced impact on consumer spending. .....(i´m reading this correct. they put an if in front of the mew impact. what a joke. just look at the mew impact on gdp.../ kann meinen augne nicht glauben. die stllen in ihrer vorhersage für 07 den einfluß des mew in frage. bei dieser grafik schwer zu verstehen.....)


The experience of the U.K. and Australia offer both comfort and warning. Consumer spending growth decelerated when the housing markets slowed in those countries in 2004-2005, but it did not grind to a halt. But it is not clear how useful those examples will prove as guides. The U.K. was helped by buoyant global growth and Australia by the commodities boom. Neither had the same huge rise in housing inventory that we have seen in the U.S.

Global Spillover Risk
Canada and Mexico
are the economies most directly exposed to weaker U.S. growth. But in thinking about the impact of a weaker U.S. growth impulse on the global economy, direct trade links are only the starting point.


Figure 5 summarizes the ways in which weaker U.S. growth can impact the global economy, including trade, business confidence and a broad array of financial market linkages. Indeed, U.S. economic data and associated market movements at turning points in the U.S. cycle tend to have a greater impact on Eurozone and Japanese markets than the local data. ......

the Eurozone is experiencing another form of spillover, in the form of the euro’s appreciation against the dollar.

A U.S. slowdown as a result of a U.S.-centric housing correction is very different to the 2001 experience of a common shock in the form of a stock market/capital spending bust. While business investment is strong in the Eurozone and Japan, it is vulnerable in the event that below-consensus U.S. growth feeds into weaker business confidence around the globe.....

.... As for monetary policy, one question is how long the window of opportunity remains open for the Bank of Japan and possibly the European Central Bank to raise rates further. Fed rate cuts would send a signal of external risks. In the event of weaker than expected growth, the BoJ will be extremely reluctant to cut rates and past experience would suggest that the ECB would be in no hurry at all to react.

Monetary policymakers in English speaking countries, which are further ahead in the rate cycle and, like the Fed, currently focused on near-term inflation risks, would be the first to follow the Fed’s lead.

China has provided an increasingly important source of demand growth in Asia owing to its rapid economic expansion and openness to trade. The U.S. has accounted for about 20% of overall global growth since 2002, measured at purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rates, while China has contributed 30% of global growth. ......In spite of its rapid growth, in nominal U.S. dollar terms, China’s economy is not much larger than the U.K.

Since trade accounts for such a large share of China’s economy, the gap with the U.S. in terms of imports is much narrower than the GDP gap. In October, U.S. imports were worth about $182bn while China’s came in at about $64bn. But a large share of that import bill represents intermediate goods shipped in from China’s neighbors to be re-exported in the form of finished goods to the U.S., meaning that independent of the Chinese authorities’ efforts to slow investment spending, slower U.S. growth should have an impact on Chinese import demand. The U.S. trade deficit stood at $59bn in the month of October. China’s trade surplus was $24bn. Over time, continued growth and a shift towards consumption will mean that China will indeed emerge as a second global bass drum. For now it is the high-hat cymbal.

To give an idea of the amount of ground that would have to be made up in the event of a more pronounced slowdown in U.S. consumer spending, it is worth noting that U.S. consumer spending accounts for about 21% of world GDP, compared with 14% for the Eurozone and a similar amount for the whole of Asia, including Japan and China. As for the oil exporting countries, the OECD2 points out that in spite of the big rise in petrodollars over the past few years, merchandise exports from its member countries to OPEC have been decelerating since early 2005. Oil exporters have taken over from developing Asian nations as the largest component of the global savings glut, measured by their combined current account surpluses.http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/12/petrodollar-pegor-why-all-talk-about.html

Over time, strong growth in China and other emerging market countries will reduce the role of the U.S. in setting the global tempo – a long-term decoupling. ....... Every country can’t run a current account surplus: the world is a closed economy.



Labels: , , , ,