Thursday, March 01, 2007

Plundered Fortress / pump and dump at its best / hall of fame !

make sure you read this one. to me this feels like the mania in 1999/2000. it is just unbelievable that this ipo from fortress was such a success. it´s a wonder that they have the to file for an ipo......congratulations to the top 5 that made a fortune. but the rational from buyers of this modern "pets.com" is beyond me.........

i think they will someday wake up and see/feel like "emperor´s with new cloth"

das teil kann ich jedem wärmstens empfehlen. wenn das keine erinnerungen an das jahr 1999/2000 hervorruft.....ein wunder das dieses ipo ein erfolg geworden ist. alle achtung das die überghaupt den mumm hatten so etwas als ipo zu wagen.....glückwunsch an die 5 top leute die mrd gemacht haben. aber was die käufer dieser modernen "pets.com" denken entzieht sich meiner vorstellungskraft.

erinnert mich stark an "des kaisers neue kleider"......



thanks to txchick57 http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=2413#comments and brett arends from http://www.thestreet.com/ ( looks there is at least one smart writer besides kass)

When it comes to hedge fund company Fortress Investments , one thing's for sure: Chief executive Wesley Edens and the other principals didn't get where they are today by leaving money on the table.

Fortress went public two weeks ago and doubled in price on the first day. But what investors may not realize is that the five principals pretty much stripped the company clean just before the IPO.

I don't mean they cleaned up the balance sheet. I mean they cleaned out the vault. Page five of the prospectus shows they withdrew $446.9 million from the company in "cash distributions" last year.

Plus another $409 million in January.

They collected a further $888 million on Jan. 17 by selling a small stake to Japanese bank Nomura. Oh yes, and they pocketed a further $22.8 million in the final weeks before this month's IPO.

A table buried on page 94 of the prospectus shows the remarkable facts. ( at least they have printed it in english...../immerhin ist das prospekt in english....)

Between January 2005 and this month's IPO, the five principals of Fortress -- Edens, Peter Briger, Robert Kauffman, Randal Nardone and Michael Novogratz -- cashed out $1.04 billion. "That does not include the Nomura transaction," adds company spokeswoman Lilly Donohue.

Total withdrawn in the two years before they took it public: $1.9 billion. Most of that was in the final few months.

This isn't just every penny that the company earned over that period -- it's a lot more.

By the time the owners opened the doors to the investing public this month, the company wasn't just out of cash -- it had negative book value. Liabilities actually exceeded assets by $507 million. / compared to fortress pets.com looked like a solid investment... :-) i know that this is not comparing apples to apples but i couldn´t resist........ damit sieht sogar pets.com rückblickend solide aus....:-) mir ist schon klar das man hier äpfel mit birnen vergleicht. konnte der versuchung aber nicht widersetehn.....

In other words, the owners didn't just clean out the vault. They left a pile of IOUs -- and used the new money to balance the books.

When the overallotment is finally calculated, ordinary investors will probably have put in $685 million.

Let's be clear. Edens and his partners have done nothing illegal. Let's even go as far as saying they did nothing unethical.

They sold a stake in the company to the investing public on an "as is" basis. And all this was disclosed in the prospectus. (So, too, by the way, is the company helicopter).

Caveat emptor.

....The emptying of the vault isn't the only interesting thing the prospectus turns up. There are, for example, various obligations that the newly public company still owes to the five principals.

For example, Fortress Investments has indemnified them for up to $283 million in investment management fees they may not have earned.

Those are performance fees that the principals have already pocketed from Fortress' private-equity and hedge funds, based on forecast returns. If the funds fall short of those forecasts, the principals may have to give some or all of that money back.

Now, thanks to the IPO, the money will come from the public company.

The obligations don't end there.

Even after the IPO, the principals will still own somewhere between 68% and 78% of the business, in the form of special units in the operating company. When the principals exchange these units in the future for ordinary shares, Fortress ought to get a tax benefit. The new shares, after all, will have a much higher tax-cost basis.

But according to the prospectus, whenever an exchange occurs, Fortress Investments has to hand over 85% of any tax benefit to the principal.

In cash.

As no one knows the value that shares will have when this occurs, you can't put a number on that obligation right now. But a fascinating footnote reveals just how big it may be.

The Nomura transaction alone, on a pro forma basis, raised the cost basis by $945 million. And that involved exchanging units for just 55 million new shares.

The amount of equity still to be exchanged: six times as much.

All of which is great news for people at the top of the company. The five principals own stock that is today valued at around $10 billion. There's another 51 million shares being handed out to key employees in the IPO. Value today: another $1.6 billion.

thanks to ggg bear for this link "Fortress execs hit $10 billion jackpot" http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/09/markets/ipo/fortress/index.htm

Labels: , , , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Barry Ritholtz said...

Doug Kass called this the Fortress Top!

8:34 AM  
Blogger jmf said...

hello barry,

i remember it.

but i thought this was a comment on the 80% spike after the ipo and not the lousy fundamentals.

either way you look at it he was right!

should be good feeling buying fortress at over 35$ at the opening day.... :-)

8:58 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home